Guide
How to Write a Research Question
A step-by-step guide for high school students, with examples across medicine, economics, law, AI, and the humanities.
Why the Research Question Is the Most Important Part
The research question is the single most important decision in any research project. It determines what you read, how you structure your argument, what counts as evidence, and what you can honestly claim to have found. A weak question — one that is too broad, too vague, unanswerable with the resources available, or essentially already answered — produces weak research regardless of how much effort goes into it.
Most students start with a topic, not a question: "I'm interested in climate change," "I want to research AI ethics," "I'd like to do something on the criminal justice system." These are starting points, not research questions. The process of converting a topic into a question is itself a core intellectual skill — one that university students spend years developing, and one that distinguishes research from essay-writing.
A good research question is specific, open (it has no obvious pre-determined answer), answerable with the methods and sources available to you, and genuinely interesting — meaning it is not obvious why the answer should be one thing rather than another. This guide takes you through how to get there.
Step 1: Start with an Area of Genuine Interest
Research questions that are genuinely motivated — that come from real curiosity about a problem — produce better work than questions selected because they sound impressive. The first step is identifying not just a subject area, but a specific tension, puzzle, or disagreement within that area that you actually find interesting.
Tension is the key word. Research questions emerge from places where things are not settled: where competing explanations exist, where evidence seems to pull in different directions, where a commonly held view turns out to be more complicated on closer inspection, or where a phenomenon has not yet been adequately explained. If you read something and thought "but that doesn't make sense given X" or "I don't understand why this works the way it does" — those are seeds of research questions.
Practically: spend time reading around your area of interest before trying to write a question. Read widely enough that you encounter disagreements, open problems, and contested claims. The question will often emerge from this reading rather than being constructed in advance.
Step 2: Narrow from Topic to Problem to Question
There is a three-stage narrowing process that produces a viable research question. Most students try to skip stages one and two, which is why most first attempts at a research question are still too broad to work with.
Topic → Problem → Question
Topic: "The criminal justice system and mental health"
Problem: "People with mental health conditions are disproportionately incarcerated in England and Wales, yet diversion programmes exist"
Question: "To what extent do mental health diversion schemes in England and Wales reduce reoffending rates among defendants with acute mental illness?"
Notice what happened in that narrowing: the topic is enormous (the entire intersection of criminal justice and mental health); the problem identifies a specific tension (disproportionate incarceration despite the existence of alternatives); the question makes that tension answerable by specifying a place (England and Wales), a mechanism (diversion schemes), a population (defendants with acute mental illness), and an outcome (reoffending rates).
The question is also open: it is not obvious whether diversion schemes are effective at reducing reoffending, and serious academic disagreement exists. This makes it a genuine research question rather than a fact-retrieval exercise.
Step 3: Test Your Question Against Four Criteria
Once you have a draft question, test it against the following four criteria before committing to it. A question that fails any of these criteria needs revision.
1. Is it specific enough?
"What are the effects of social media on mental health?" is not specific enough. It encompasses decades of research, dozens of methodological approaches, every age group, every platform, and every dimension of mental health. A specific version: "Does passive social media consumption predict higher levels of loneliness in adolescents aged 13–17 compared to active engagement?" This is answerable with defined methods in defined scope.
2. Is it genuinely open?
A question to which the answer is essentially settled in the academic literature is not a research question; it is a fact-retrieval question. "Does smoking cause lung cancer?" is not a research question — the evidence is definitive. "Does smoking in adolescence cause a statistically significant reduction in lung capacity that persists into adulthood independent of subsequent smoking behaviour?" is more genuinely open. At pre-university level, the question does not need to break new ground in the field, but it should at least require genuine engagement with competing evidence rather than simply summarising what is already known.
3. Is it answerable with the resources available to you?
A question that requires access to a laboratory, proprietary datasets, or fieldwork in another country is not answerable for a pre-university student working independently. "Can I engage with the evidence that exists on this question using academic sources, publicly available data, and close analysis?" is the practical test. Most strong pre-university research is theoretical or literature-based rather than empirical, and there is nothing wrong with this: strong arguments built from existing evidence are the foundation of most scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and law.
4. Can it be answered in the available length and time?
A question that would require a doctoral thesis to answer properly is too large. For a 3,000–6,000 word research essay completed over several weeks, the question needs to be narrow enough that a genuine argument can be constructed, supported with evidence, and reached a defensible conclusion within that length. If you cannot sketch out the structure of your argument in a paragraph — what you will argue, why, and on the basis of what evidence — the question may still be too broad.
Step 4: Choose the Right Question Type for Your Discipline
Different disciplines have different conventions for what a research question looks like. Matching the question type to the discipline is important — a question framed in the way an economist would ask it is different from how a historian or a biologist would frame the same problem.
Sciences and social sciences: causal or correlational questions
"Does X cause Y?" or "Is X associated with Y?" are the core forms. These require careful attention to methodology: what counts as evidence, how confounds are controlled for, what the limits of the available data are. At pre-university level, it is usually more honest to frame the question as "To what extent does the evidence support the claim that X causes Y?" which allows for engagement with the literature rather than an original empirical study.
Humanities: interpretive and analytical questions
"How should we understand X?" "What does the evidence reveal about Y?" "In what ways does A challenge or complicate B?" These questions do not seek a single right answer but rather a well-argued, evidence-supported position. History, literature, philosophy, and art history all operate primarily in this register. The argument is the answer, and the quality of the argument — not the correctness of a finding — is what is being assessed.
Law and policy: normative and evaluative questions
"Should X be the law?" "Is the current approach to Y adequate?" "How does the legal framework for Z compare to the policy objectives it is meant to achieve?" These questions combine factual analysis with normative argument. A good law or policy research question requires the student to engage with both what the law or policy is and what it should be, using clear criteria for evaluation.
Economics and business: explanatory and evaluative questions
"What explains the phenomenon of X?" "How effective has policy Y been in achieving Z?" "What are the economic mechanisms behind A?" These questions require engagement with economic theory as well as empirical evidence. The strongest economics questions identify a specific market, behaviour, or policy and interrogate it through an analytical framework.
Examples of Strong and Weak Research Questions
The following contrasts illustrate what separates viable research questions from common mistakes.
Medicine & Life Sciences
✗ Weak: What is CRISPR and how does it work?
✓ Strong: To what extent does the off-target editing rate of CRISPR-Cas9 systems constitute a significant barrier to therapeutic applications in sickle cell disease?
The weak question is definitional and encyclopaedic. The strong question identifies a specific tension in a specific application.
Economics
✗ Weak: Is minimum wage good or bad for the economy?
✓ Strong: Does the empirical evidence from the UK's National Living Wage support the monopsony model of low-wage labour markets over the competitive model?
The weak question is a yes/no opinion question. The strong question tests competing theoretical frameworks against specific evidence.
History
✗ Weak: Was the Treaty of Versailles the cause of the Second World War?
✓ Strong: To what extent did the reparations provisions of the Treaty of Versailles contribute to hyperinflation in the Weimar Republic, and how does this compare to the monetary policy explanations advanced by Holtfrerich and others?
The weak question is a debate students have been having since 1945 without reaching resolution. The strong question identifies a specific mechanism and engages with the historiographical debate.
Law
✗ Weak: Should assisted dying be legal in the UK?
✓ Strong: Does the "safeguards" framework proposed in the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill adequately address the "slippery slope" concern identified in jurisdictions where assisted dying has been legalised, and what does the Belgian experience suggest?
The weak question is a general opinion question. The strong question identifies a specific legal mechanism, a specific concern, and a specific comparative case.
The Role of a Mentor in Developing a Research Question
The single most productive investment a student can make in the early stages of research is working with someone who has navigated this process many times — not a teacher who has guided students through coursework, but a researcher who has spent years formulating their own questions and reading others' work critically.
A mentor operating at doctoral level will quickly identify whether a proposed question is answerable, whether it is actually asking what the student thinks it is asking, and what the relevant literature looks like. They can tell a student within a single session whether a question is viable, and if not, why — and help redirect toward a version that works. This saves weeks of effort spent on a question that was never going to produce a satisfying piece of work.
More importantly, a strong mentor helps the student develop their own research instincts — so that over the course of the project, the student becomes more capable of evaluating questions for themselves. The goal is not to be told what question to ask; it is to learn how to ask better questions. That skill, once developed, is among the most durable assets a student brings into their university education.
Summer cohort deadline · Applications due June 25. A few places remain. We assess applications in order of receipt.
ScholarBridge matches students with doctoral-level or equivalent research mentors across six academic fields. Every project is student-led and completed to a standard the student can stand behind in any university interview.
Explore all programmes